This is slightly uncomfortable to confess, but here goes. A handful of titles wait by my bed, each incompletely read. Within my phone, I'm midway through thirty-six audio novels, which pales alongside the nearly fifty digital books I've set aside on my e-reader. This doesn't count the increasing stack of pre-release editions next to my living room table, striving for endorsements, now that I have become a published author personally.
Initially, these numbers might look to support contemporary comments about modern attention spans. One novelist observed not long back how simple it is to break a person's concentration when it is divided by social media and the news cycle. He remarked: “Maybe as people's concentration evolve the fiction will have to adapt with them.” But as an individual who once would doggedly get through any novel I picked up, I now consider it a personal freedom to put down a book that I'm not in the mood for.
I do not think that this habit is a result of a limited concentration – instead it stems from the awareness of life passing quickly. I've always been impressed by the spiritual teaching: “Place the end daily before your eyes.” One point that we each have a just limited time on this world was as shocking to me as to everyone. But at what other time in human history have we ever had such direct access to so many amazing creative works, whenever we choose? A wealth of options meets me in each bookstore and behind every screen, and I want to be purposeful about where I channel my attention. Might “DNF-ing” a book (abbreviation in the book world for Incomplete) be rather than a indication of a limited focus, but a thoughtful one?
Notably at a period when the industry (and thus, selection) is still led by a certain group and its quandaries. While reading about individuals distinct from ourselves can help to build the capacity for understanding, we also choose books to think about our individual lives and position in the society. Until the books on the shelves more fully represent the backgrounds, stories and concerns of possible individuals, it might be very challenging to keep their focus.
Naturally, some writers are actually successfully crafting for the “contemporary interest”: the concise style of certain recent books, the tight pieces of additional writers, and the quick sections of several modern stories are all a excellent example for a briefer style and method. And there is no shortage of author tips designed for grabbing a consumer: hone that opening line, improve that beginning section, raise the stakes (further! higher!) and, if crafting crime, put a dead body on the first page. This guidance is all sound – a prospective representative, house or buyer will devote only a few limited seconds choosing whether or not to forge ahead. There is no benefit in being obstinate, like the individual on a workshop I participated in who, when challenged about the plot of their novel, stated that “it all becomes clear about three-quarters of the into the story”. Not a single writer should put their follower through a sequence of challenges in order to be grasped.
And I certainly create to be comprehended, as far as that is possible. On occasion that needs leading the reader's interest, steering them through the story point by efficient beat. Occasionally, I've understood, understanding takes time – and I must give myself (as well as other authors) the freedom of exploring, of adding depth, of digressing, until I hit upon something meaningful. A particular writer contends for the story developing new forms and that, as opposed to the standard narrative arc, “different forms might assist us conceive innovative ways to create our narratives vital and true, persist in creating our books novel”.
From that perspective, the two perspectives align – the fiction may have to adapt to fit the contemporary reader, as it has continually achieved since it first emerged in the 18th century (in its current incarnation now). Perhaps, like earlier writers, tomorrow's writers will return to releasing in parts their works in publications. The future those authors may already be sharing their writing, chapter by chapter, on digital platforms like those accessed by countless of regular visitors. Art forms shift with the era and we should let them.
But we should not say that every changes are completely because of shorter attention spans. If that were the case, short story collections and micro tales would be regarded far more {commercial|profitable|marketable
Elara is a passionate storyteller and cultural critic, dedicated to exploring the depths of narrative and its impact on society.