Picture this: a smiling the Danish striker wearing Napoli's colors. Now, place that with a dejected Benjamin Sesko in a Manchester United kit, looking as if he's missed an open goal. Don't worry locating a real picture of that miss; context is your adversary. Now, add statistics in a large, comical font. Don't forget some emoticons. Share it everywhere.
Will you mention that Højlund's tally includes strikes in the premier European competition while Sesko isn't playing in continental tournaments? Certainly not. And would you highlight that four of Højlund's goals came against Belarus and Greece, or that Denmark is far superior to Sesko's Slovenia and generates many more scoring opportunities. If you manage online for a major brand, raw engagement is your livelihood, Manchester United are the biggest draw, and nuance is your sworn enemy.
Thus the cycle of online material turns. Your next task is to scan a 44-minute interview featuring the legendary goalkeeper and find the part where he describes the acquisition of Sesko "weird". Just before, where Schmeichel qualifies his remarks by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... yes, remove that part. No one needs that. Just ensure "strange" and "Sesko" appear together in the headline. People will be outraged.
The heart of fall has long been one of my favourite periods to observe football. Leaves fall, the wind turns, the teams and tactics are still fresh, all is novel and yet everything is beginning to form. Key players of the season ahead are planting their flags. The transfer window is shut. No one is talking about the quadruple yet. All teams are in contention. At this precise point, anything is possible.
Yet, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has long been one of my most disliked times to read about football. Because although no outcomes are decided, opinions must be formed immediately. The City winger is reborn. The German talent has been a crushing disappointment. Could Semenyo be the best player in the league at this moment? We need a decision now.
In many ways, Benjamin Sesko feels like Patient Zero in this respect, a player inextricably trapped between football's opposing, unavoidable forces. The imperative to withhold final conclusions, to let technical development and tactical sophistication to mature. And the demand to produce permanent definitive judgment, a conveyor belt of opinions and jokes, out-of-context criticisms and pointless contrasts, a puzzle that can not truly be solved.
I do not propose to provide a substantive evaluation of Sesko's stint at United to date. He has started four times in the top flight in a wildly inconsistent team, scored two goals, and taken a mere of 116 contacts with the ball. What precisely are we analysing? Nor do I propose to replicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's notable debate "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits argue thrillingly on a podcast over whether Sesko needs ten strikes to be deemed successful this season (Neville), or whether it's really more like twelve or thirteen (Wright).
Despite this I loved watching him at his former club: a big, fast racing car of a forward, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his abilities: given the license to attack but also the leeway to fail. And in part this is why United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be at the moment: a place where "brutal verdicts" are handed down in about the time it takes to watch a pre-roll ad, the club with the widest and most pitiless gulf between the patience and space he needs, and the opportunity he is going to get.
We saw a case of this during the national team pause, when a viral chart conveniently stated that the player had been deemed – by a wide margin – the worst signing of the summer transfer window by a survey of 20 agents. And of course, the media are not alone in such behavior. Team social media, online personalities, anonymous X accounts with a oddly high number of pornbot followers: everybody with a vested interest is now basically operating along the identical rules, an ecosystem explicitly nosed towards provocation.
Endless scrolling and tapping. What is happening to us? Are we aware, on some level, what this infinite stream of irritation is doing to our brains? Quite apart from the inherent strangeness of being a player in the middle of it all, knowing on a bizarre chain-reaction level that every single thing about players is now essentially material, commodity, open-source property to be packaged and exchanged.
And yes, partly this is because United are United, the entity that continues to feed the cycle, a big club that must constantly be producing the strong emotions. But also, partly this is a temporary malaise, a pendulum of opinion most visibly and harshly glimpsed at this time of year, roughly four weeks after the window has closed. Throughout the summer we have been coveting players, eulogising them, salivating over them. Now, just a few weeks in, a lot of those very players are already being dismissed as broken goods. Should we start to be concerned about a new signing? Was Arsenal's purchase of their striker wise? What was the purpose of another expensive buy?
It seems fitting that Sesko meets their rivals on the weekend: a team at once 13 months unbeaten at their stadium in the league and yet in their own situation of perceived turmoil, like filing a missing person’s report on a person who popped to the shops 30 minutes ago. Defensively suspect. Mohamed Salah past his prime. Alexander Isak an expensive flop. The coach losing his hair.
Maybe we have not yet quite grasped the way the narrative of football has begun to supplant football itself, to influence the way we watch it, an whole competition reoriented around talking points and immediate responses, something that occurs in the background while we browse through our devices, incapable to disconnect from the saline drip of takes and further hot takes. Perhaps Sesko taking the hit right now. However, everyone is losing a part of the experience here.
Elara is a passionate storyteller and cultural critic, dedicated to exploring the depths of narrative and its impact on society.